Jakub Mensik vs Miomir Kecmanovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Sep at 08:31 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Mensik vs M. Kecmanovic

CZE
2
Win
Played
0
Win

SRB
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mensik 2 - 0 Kecmanovic
They have played 4 sets in total, with Jakub Mensik winning 4 and Miomir Kecmanovic winning 0. The last match between Jakub Mensik and Miomir Kecmanovic was at the China Open - Beijing, 26-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jakub Mensik getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mensik | 2 |
| Kecmanovic | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) China Open - Beijing(09-26-25)
(R2) Erste Bank Open - Vienna(10-24-24)
J. Mensik vs M. Kecmanovic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,325,545 | Career Prize Money | $5,174,560 |
| 62.14% (151-92) | Career Total W/L | 55.94% (320-252) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 61.54% (32-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.68% (21-26) |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
J. Mensik vs M. Kecmanovic Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Miomir Kecmanovic's recent form shows a 47.62% win rate on second serve points, slightly trailing Jakub Mensik's 48.48%. Could this minor edge influence the match outcome?
- Return Game Analysis: Kecmanovic has won 46.91% of opponents' second serve points in recent form, compared to Mensik's 45.35%. For first serve returns, Kecmanovic leads slightly with 24.30% over Mensik's 23.12%. Does this suggest an advantage for Kecmanovic in returns?
- Handling Pressure: Kecmanovic displays better breakpoint saving capability at 56.50%, eclipsing Mensik's 53.57%. Could this resilience under pressure be a match decider?
- Performance Overview: Over the past year, Mensik holds a stronger win percentage of 60.29% compared to Kecmanovic's 49.18%, which might suggest a trend favoring Mensik.
- Surface Preference: Kecmanovic excels on clay (60% win rate), while Mensik thrives on hard courts with a 70% win rate. Could the surface of this match influence the outcome given their preferences?
- Player Level: Kecmanovic has been competing predominantly in main tour matches with a 50% win rate; meanwhile, Mensik has a 73.08% win rate in Masters series, potentially demonstrating a performance edge.
- Head-to-Head History: Mensik leads the direct encounters, having won the only match between them in straight sets. How significant is this past performance in predicting future outcomes?
- Opponent Quality: Mensik has faced higher-ranked players on average (rank 64.94) than Kecmanovic (rank 78.46) over the past year, suggesting a challenging competitive landscape for Mensik.
- Deciding Set Performance: In potential deciding set scenarios, Kecmanovic holds a slight 44% win rate advantage over Mensik's 43% in recent matches.
- current Event Considerations: Performance during an ongoing event must also be considered for an accurate prediction, underscoring the importance of recent matches and player form.
Editorial Prediction (September 25, 2025, UTC):
After analyzing their recent performances and match-ups, a few key factors emerge. Mensik slightly outperforms Kecmanovic on second serve points and shows a higher overall win percentage in the past year. His previous victory against Kecmanovic further supports his favored position.
While Kecmanovic has strengths in returning first and second serves, combined with a marginally better record in handling pressure and deciding sets, the head-to-head result remains prominent in forecasting match success.
Mensik's ability to maintain a higher win rate in both the Masters series and on surfaces conducive to his style, especially hard courts, tips the balance. Taking into account these aspects, Mensik is favored to claim victory in the upcoming match.
Jakub Mensik vs Miomir Kecmanovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Mensik vs M. Kecmanovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 26 | Games Won | 18 |
| 33 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:52:41 | Average Match Time | 1:52:41 |
| 58% (97/166) | 1st Serve % | 52% (89/171) |
| 81% (79/97) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (65/89) |
| 42% (29/69) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (37/82) |
| 38% (6/16) | Break Pts Won % | 14% (3/21) |
| 40% (69/171) | Return Points Win % | 35% (58/166) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Mensik Recent Matches Played
M. Kecmanovic Recent Matches Played

J. Mensik vs M. Kecmanovic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.14% (151/92) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.94% (320/252) |
| 59.73% (359/242) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.50% (769/642) |
| 52.50% (3045/2755) | Games Win/Loss | 51.97% (7045/6510) |
| 69.09% (76/34) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.18% (141/110) |
| 58.02% (47/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.19% (124/82) |
| 57.89% (22/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.33% (37/38) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 45.00% (18/22) |
| 0.71 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 2027 | Aces Total | 2081 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 876 | Total Double Faults | 1145 |
| 1:46:39 | Average Match Time | 1:40:48 |
| 286.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 336.85 |
| 59% (10617/18088) | 1st Serve % | 60% (24742/40923) |
| 75% (7934/10617) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (17362/24742) |
| 49% (3636/7475) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8575/16176) |
| 42% (670/1611) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1581/3872) |
| 38% (6904/18059) | Return Points Win % | 38% (15988/41756) |
| 68.00% (17/8) | Slam W/L | 50.79% (32/31) |
| 63.16% (24/14) | Masters W/L | 40.00% (36/54) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Cups W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 55.32% (26/21) | Main Tour W/L | 53.92% (117/100) |
| 55.38% (36/29) | Challenger W/L | 62.37% (58/35) |
| 72.41% (42/16) | Futures W/L | 72.63% (69/26) |
| 65% (140/217) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (285/507) |
| 50% (11/22) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (29/58) |
| 56% (63/113) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (112/244) |
| 53% (43/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (90/181) |
| 84% (160/135) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (340/275) |
| 16% (160/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (340/65) |
| 19% (83/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (232/45) |